Landwrap July 2009 - e-dealing

July 2009 - Issue 58
Landwrap - Authoritative news and information for survey and titles customers
  • Landonline & Regulatory News
  • e-dealing News
  • e survey News
  • ta ecertification News

Māori land transaction compliance issues

Following a compliance audit of Māori land-related e-dealings, the Landonline website has been updated to include reference information on compliance issues for conveyancers.

The 2008 compliance audit indicated some lawyers were not familiar with the legislative requirements around Māori land dealing, and did not always recognise when a transaction should be referred to the Māori Land Court for confirmation.

In addition to the new website content (summarised below), further information on Māori land compliance issues is available from the New Zealand Law Society (NZLS). An article in the March 2009 issue of Property Lawyer outlines controls that have been put in place to provide assurance that Māori Land Court confirmation has, where necessary, been obtained for e-dealing transactions affecting Māori freehold land.

Answers to frequently asked questions on compliance issues are available on this website.

Compliance responsibilities

The Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (the Act) puts a number of responsibilities on conveyancers acting in land transactions that change the ownership status of Māori land. The Act gives the Māori Land Court jurisdiction to determine by status order the particular status of any parcel of land.

In general, where Māori freehold land is to be alienated, an application for confirmation must first be made to the Māori Land Court. Specific requirements vary according to the type of land dealing. While the requirements are clear for straightforward transactions such as transfer and mortgages, other less common transactions (such as lease variations) are not so explicitly addressed in the legislation.

The lawyer's responsibility when acting in a Māori land transaction is to ensure compliance issues are addressed. In Marshall vs Registrar-General of Land1,the High Court went so far as to say that "the heaviest responsibility surely lay on the solicitor in control of the transaction". The decision also alludes to the possible subrogation issues between the Registrar-General of Land and the practitioner responsible in cases where land is transferred without confirmation.

LINZ is responsible, via the Registrar-General of Land, for ensuring transactions affecting Māori land are not registered unless the requisite confirmation is obtained, as required by section 126 of the Act.

Determining the ownership status of land

One of the challenges facing LINZ and lawyers in these matters is how to correctly identify Māori freehold land within the land transfer system. If a land title is noted with an order declaring status, ownership will be self-evident.

Alternatively, potential Māori land status may be inferred from the land description or other historical entries on the title (e.g. prior Māori Land Court vesting orders). Indications of Māori land ownership may include a Māori block name or possibly a succession of owners with Māori names. Refer to article Māori land certification, in the May 2008 edition of Landwrap, for further information.

If in doubt, practitioners should make appropriate inquiries with the Māori Land Court. As a first step, you could consult Māori Land Online.

A joint LINZ and Ministry of Justice project to remove discrepancies between the Māori Land Court's title records and those held by LINZ has been underway since 2004, and should be completed by the end of 2009. As status orders are being registered as part of this process, this will help to address the Māori land identification issues.

e-dealing system controls

The statutory scheme for the e-dealing system relies on lawyers' certifications as to client authority, identity and statutory compliance. A document summarising e-dealing statutory requirements - PDF 1.6MB is available on this website.

It was recognised several years ago that in order to extend the certification process to the requirements of the Act, further steps would be required to comprehensively identify potential Māori land within Landonline. In consultation with the Māori Land Court, LINZ developed a regime to identify and electronically flag potential Māori land based on its own records and data supplied by the Court. The flag provides a prompt for lawyers to address the compliance issues and triggers special e-dealing certification options for the Act.

Despite the above controls, in more than a few instances lawyers have made certifications indicating the Māori land compliance issues have been properly addressed when in fact they have not.

Accordingly, LINZ has made changes to the system so that any transactions against flagged titles step down to lodge for additional quality assurance by LINZ staff prior to registration. In practice, conveyancers are required to lodge an image of the confirmation notice at the above stage of their e-dealing transaction on Landonline. Where confirmation is not required, they are asked to provide evidence of this instruction.

Of course, the above flagging system is merely a compliance backstop and does not remove a lawyer's responsibility to investigate land status early in the transaction, and obtain Māori Land Court confirmation where required (refer to article Māori land certification).

LINZ will continue to monitor compliance trends in this area and review its controls as appropriate. Cases of non-compliance are treated seriously and referred to the NZLS' Lawyers Complaints Service.

How to remove an incorrect flag

From time to time, practitioners will encounter flagged titles that are in fact general land. If you are certain the land is general land, proceed with your e-dealing by making a certification that you are complying with the Act.

Phone in or send evidence the land is general land to LINZ Customer Support and ask for the flag to be removed. In some cases, information on a historical title will be sufficient evidence. In other cases you may decide to attach correspondence with the Māori Land Court. LINZ will then arrange to have flags removed, if appropriate.

1 [1995] 2 NZLR 189

Back to top

Updated e-dealing FAQs

As a result of questions asked at the recent presentations to the New Zealand Institute of Legal Executives, we have updated the e-dealing frequently asked questions (FAQs) on this website.

Specifically, new FAQs have been added to the following topic areas:

For more information about the presentations, refer to article LINZ presents at NZILE district meetings in the June 2009 edition of Landwrap.

Back to top

e-dealing watch points for practitioners

e-dealing watch points are continually being added to. You will find these and links to other e-dealing related articles on this website.

Advice to system managers when disassociating a user

System managers have responsibility for controlling a user's privileges, and maintaining users within the firm. One of the most important roles is to disassociate a user from the firm when they cease employment with the firm. When a user is disassociated they can no longer log on to Landonline from the firm, and cannot perform work for that firm.

It is important, therefore, to ensure any work allocated to that person is reassigned before they are disassociated.

Steps to disassociate a user from the firm

System managers can disassociate a user from their firm if, for example, the user leaves the firm.

Note: Before disassociating a user from your firm, you should reassign all work in that user's Workspace.

To disassociate a user, in the Maintain Firm screen:

  1. Check for any work associated to the user
  2. Update role names in any dealings (if applicable)
  3. Select the Users tab in the Maintain Firm screen
  4. Select the user to be disassociated from the Associated Users' list.
  5. Click Disassociate button.
  6. Click Yes to the confirmation message that displays
  7. Click OK button. to save the changes and close the Maintain Firm screen.
Caution: Once you disassociate a user, you cannot associate the user with the firm again. This can only be done by a LINZ System Administrator. The disassociated user's work will re-display in Workspace once the user is re-associated to the firm.

Below is a list of all the tasks that can be performed by the System Manager:

  • view an individual user's details
  • modify the firm's contact details
  • associate and disassociate privileges to a user
  • associate a licence to a user
  • modify user groups
  • disassociate a user from the firm
  • generate a licence usage report
  • customise mortgagee quick codes for the firm.

Transmissions on death of surviving joint tenant

If the last surviving joint tenant dies before the transmission by survivorship has been prepared and registered, two transmissions are required except if the estate is a life estate or lease for life.

The first transmission should be a transmission by survivorship to the last surviving joint tenant. The second transmission should be a transmission by executor/administrator from the executor/administrator of the estate of the last surviving joint tenant.

The solicitor certifying and signing the transmissions will need to hold as evidence:

  • one authority and instruction (A&I) from each executor/administrator covering both transmissions
  • a copy of the death certificates
  • a copy of the probate
  • a statutory declaration that includes a recital about the sequence of events for both the transmission by survivorship and transmission to the executor.

For life estates or lease for life, only one transmission is required (i.e. transmission determining the life estate). In this case, the solicitor signing and certifying the transmission will need to hold as evidence:

  • an A&I from the remainderman or reversioner
  • a copy of the death certificates
  • a statutory declaration that includes a recital about the sequence of events for the death(s) of the life tenants.

Who holds the Territorial Authority (TA) consent to the surrender of a compulsory easement?

Who should hold the consent of the TA where an easement is being surrendered, and the easement was a condition of subdivisional consent (compulsory easement)?

If a compulsory easement is to be surrendered, the solicitor acting for the grantee of the easement will be responsible for making the certification relating to the TA's consent to the surrender.

In some cases, because the grantor of an easement has requested the surrender of easement, they have obtained and hold the TA consent. In this case, the grantee's representative should obtain a copy of the consent that he/she is satisfied is an authenticate copy of the original.

Back to top